| From: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dan Gorman <dgorman(at)hi5(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Craig A(dot) James" <cjames(at)modgraph-usa(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Reliability recommendations |
| Date: | 2006-02-25 06:28:15 |
| Message-ID: | 43FFF8FF.8050101@paradise.net.nz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Luke Lonergan wrote:
> Mark,
>
>>Hmmm - a bit humbled by Luke's machinery :-), however, mine is probably
>>competitive on (MB/s)/$....
>
>
> Not sure - the machines I cite are about $10K each. The machine you tested
> was probably about $1500 a few years ago (my guess), and with a 5:1 ratio in
> speed versus about a 6:1 ratio in price, we're not too far off in MB/s/$
> after all :-)
>
Wow - that is remarkable performance for $10K!
Cheers
Mark
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron | 2006-02-25 11:24:55 | Re: Reliability recommendations |
| Previous Message | Luke Lonergan | 2006-02-25 06:22:49 | Re: Reliability recommendations |