Re: Backslashes in string literals

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Backslashes in string literals
Date: 2006-02-13 16:23:18
Message-ID: 43F05E16.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

This patch doesn't leave the standard_conforming_strings entry in guc.c
with the GUC_REPORT flag, which it needs for psql to work right. Should
I submit one last patch with this fix and the proper "expected"
regression file? If so, where should I send it? (The hackers list
won't take a file as big as that patch.)

-Kevin

>>> On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 3:17 pm, in message
<200602122117(dot)k1CLHuU22118(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian
<pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list
at:
>
> http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi- bin/pgpatches
>
> It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers
reviews
> and approves it.

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-02-13 16:24:35 Re: Postgresql crash (signal 11). keywords: distinct, subselect, union
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2006-02-13 16:10:41 Re: what's stored in pg_tblspc