From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
---|---|
To: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Backslashes in string literals |
Date: | 2006-02-13 16:23:18 |
Message-ID: | 43F05E16.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
This patch doesn't leave the standard_conforming_strings entry in guc.c
with the GUC_REPORT flag, which it needs for psql to work right. Should
I submit one last patch with this fix and the proper "expected"
regression file? If so, where should I send it? (The hackers list
won't take a file as big as that patch.)
-Kevin
>>> On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 3:17 pm, in message
<200602122117(dot)k1CLHuU22118(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian
<pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list
at:
>
> http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi- bin/pgpatches
>
> It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers
reviews
> and approves it.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-02-13 16:24:35 | Re: Postgresql crash (signal 11). keywords: distinct, subselect, union |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2006-02-13 16:10:41 | Re: what's stored in pg_tblspc |