From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Raising the Pl/Perl required version |
Date: | 2006-02-11 20:17:03 |
Message-ID: | 43EE463F.8060604@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
See here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-10/msg00438.php
I don't mind requiring 5.6, but I do want to think carefully about the
implications of changing the declaration of $_TD from "my" to "our",
especially if multiple triggers fire. Is there a danger we might clobber
one?
cheers
andrew
Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>
>This was raised before, but I can't find the exact thread. I'd
>like to re-open the idea of boosting the minimum Perl version
>for PL/Perl to 5.6. My primary motivation is to provide use
>of "our" for the %TD hash, as mentioned before (cannot find the
>email right now). Being as 5.6 was released nearly six years
>ago, in March of 2000, I'm hoping that this won't meet too many
>objections.
>
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jochem van Dieten | 2006-02-11 20:21:43 | Re: SpeedComparison |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2006-02-11 20:14:45 | Re: Upcoming re-releases |