Re: Raising the Pl/Perl required version

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Raising the Pl/Perl required version
Date: 2006-02-11 20:17:03
Message-ID: 43EE463F.8060604@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


See here:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-10/msg00438.php

I don't mind requiring 5.6, but I do want to think carefully about the
implications of changing the declaration of $_TD from "my" to "our",
especially if multiple triggers fire. Is there a danger we might clobber
one?

cheers

andrew

Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:

>
>This was raised before, but I can't find the exact thread. I'd
>like to re-open the idea of boosting the minimum Perl version
>for PL/Perl to 5.6. My primary motivation is to provide use
>of "our" for the %TD hash, as mentioned before (cannot find the
>email right now). Being as 5.6 was released nearly six years
>ago, in March of 2000, I'm hoping that this won't meet too many
>objections.
>
>
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jochem van Dieten 2006-02-11 20:21:43 Re: SpeedComparison
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2006-02-11 20:14:45 Re: Upcoming re-releases