Re: Bug with sequences and WAL ?

From: Philippe Ferreira <phil(dot)f(at)worldonline(dot)fr>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug with sequences and WAL ?
Date: 2006-02-04 18:32:54
Message-ID: 43E4F356.5090705@worldonline.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


>To get "exact" restart behavior we'd need to emit a separate xlog
>record for each nextval() command, which seems like a pretty high
>price considering that you cannot assume no holes in the sequence
>values anyway.
>
>
Hi,

Why not give the choice at compile-time ?

Philippe.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Claire McLister 2006-02-04 19:04:14 Re: Error with temporary tables
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-02-04 11:04:47 Re: Should I use PL/PGSQL or Perl/PGSQL?