Re: BUG #2232: Function (store procedure) prublem

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: Michael Grossman <michael(dot)grossnab(at)newconcept(dot)co(dot)il>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #2232: Function (store procedure) prublem
Date: 2006-02-03 08:19:30
Message-ID: 43E31212.4090502@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Michael Grossman wrote:
> When I passing for example 20 prams' to update a database its work fine.
> But yesterday a saw when one of the parameters the value is "109922:11"
> I gut an error parameter 11 is empty he thinks the value is a
> parameter.
> When a change this value to "109922.11" the function works fine.

You'll need to give some more details - can you produce a small function
that reproduces the error so others can test it on their machines?

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2006-02-03 08:22:31 Re: BUG #2232: Function (store procedure) prublem
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-02-03 03:55:23 Re: [BUGS] BUG #2171: Differences compiling plpgsql in ecpg