| From: | Philippe Ferreira <phil(dot)f(at)worldonline(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | jim(at)contactbda(dot)com |
| Cc: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: My very first PL/pgSQL procedure... |
| Date: | 2006-01-28 21:04:36 |
| Message-ID: | 43DBDC64.1090300@worldonline.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
>why not have server a start at 1 and server b start at max int8/2. that will give each server alot of orders before
>you have an issue. They will will not have to play games with the sequence value.
>
>Jim
>
>
Hi,
Your method is different from mine, but I think that both methods will
face the same constraints in case of failover...
Anyway, my setup is working fine, so I won't change anything !
The only point is that it could have been useful to be able to lock a
sequence...
It seems that it was possible with PostgreSQL 7.0, but was removed in 7.1 :
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2001-10/msg00928.php
Best regards,
Philippe Ferreira.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rich Shepard | 2006-01-28 21:13:54 | Re: Viewing Database Scheme |
| Previous Message | Eric B. Ridge | 2006-01-28 20:51:20 | Re: Viewing Database Scheme |