Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc
Cc: "Pollard, Mike" <mpollard(at)cincom(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Date: 2006-01-20 01:50:17
Message-ID: 43D041D9.6000202@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Yes. Representation of the DNA is probably best. But - that's a lot of
> data to use as a key in multiple tables. :-)

No then you have problems with identical twins :)

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeremy Drake 2006-01-20 01:55:42 Re: No heap lookups on index
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-01-20 00:16:03 Re: BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member?