Re: cleaning up plperl warnings

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cleaning up plperl warnings
Date: 2006-01-10 01:06:03
Message-ID: 43C3087B.2020300@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:

>>
>>Why do we need these defines at all? We don't use either of these types anywhere in the plperl code.
>>
>>Is the community perl different in what it does here from what the ActiveState perl?
>>
>>
>
>No idea, but if you don't need them, remove them so they work on your
>setup, and if it breaks other people's perl, we will hear about it
>before we package 8.2 and make adjustments.
>
>

done

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-01-10 01:20:33 Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
Previous Message Jim Buttafuoco 2006-01-10 00:58:55 Re: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working on mips[el]?