Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)

From:	Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To:	Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc:	Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
Date:	2006-01-09 23:19:20
Message-ID:	43C2EF78.7010207@dunslane.net
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2005-11-09 15:27:31 from Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>  2005-11-09 16:02:23 from Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>  2005-11-09 19:20:30 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>   2005-11-09 19:58:22 from Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>   2005-11-10 17:46:41 from Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>    2005-12-27 15:42:03 from Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>     2005-12-27 20:51:29 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>      2005-12-27 22:22:56 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>       2005-12-28 10:38:35 from Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>        2005-12-28 15:35:19 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>         2005-12-28 16:41:25 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>          2005-12-28 17:23:59 from "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>           2005-12-28 17:13:08 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>            2005-12-28 17:33:33 from "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>         2005-12-29 19:57:16 from Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>         2006-01-07 22:25:05 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>          2006-01-07 22:35:33 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>           2006-01-07 23:05:00 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>            2006-01-08 00:58:21 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> 📎             2006-01-08 13:33:40 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>              2006-01-08 16:58:45 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> 📎               2006-01-08 18:44:07 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>                2006-01-08 19:41:20 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>                2006-01-09 05:39:30 from Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>                 2006-01-09 12:17:12 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>                  2006-01-09 16:03:17 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>                   2006-01-09 16:25:23 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>                    2006-01-09 17:06:33 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>                     2006-01-09 20:29:52 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>                      2006-01-09 21:23:35 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>                     2006-01-09 23:19:20 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>                      2006-01-09 23:39:33 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>                       2006-01-09 23:43:37 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>                       2006-01-09 23:48:34 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>                        2006-01-09 23:49:59 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>                         2006-01-10 00:01:37 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>                          2006-01-10 01:20:33 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

In response to

• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) at 2006-01-09 17:06:33 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) at 2006-01-09 23:39:33 from Bruce Momjian

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Bruce Momjian	2006-01-09 23:39:33	Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
Previous Message	Bruce Momjian	2006-01-09 23:11:04	Re: cleaning up plperl warnings