Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
Date: 2006-01-08 16:58:45
Message-ID: 43C144C5.1020305@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:

>
> Further testing shows the problem persisting. Back to the drawing board.
>
>

The attached patch against cvs tip does seem to work. Instead of playing
with the environment, we simply allow perl to do its worst and then put
things back the way we wanted them.

Comments?

cheers

andrew

Attachment Content-Type Size
localefix.patch text/x-patch 2.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Luke Lonergan 2006-01-08 18:25:17 Re: Libpq COPY optimization
Previous Message Greg Stark 2006-01-08 16:49:12 Re: Stats collector performance improvement