Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT
Date: 2006-01-05 21:27:58
Message-ID: 43BD8F5E.20201@samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The following patch allows VIEW and SEQUENCE for GRANT. I didn't add
> checks for relkind, figuring it wasn't worth it, right?

I think checking the relkind is pretty reasonable, and should require
only a few lines of code -- why not do it?

-Neil

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message hubert depesz lubaczewski 2006-01-05 21:35:15 when can we get better partitioning?
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-01-05 19:58:18 Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-01-05 21:36:45 Summary table trigger example race condition
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2006-01-05 19:44:24 Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT