Re: Interesting speed anomaly

From: Zoltan Boszormenyi <zboszor(at)dunaweb(dot)hu>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Interesting speed anomaly
Date: 2005-12-15 22:59:19
Message-ID: 43A1F547.3080308@dunaweb.hu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jim C. Nasby írta:

>Those queries aren't the same though. The view is equivalent to
>
>SELECT *
>FROM
> (select 'AAA' AS prefix,id from table 1
> union select 'AAA',id from table 2
> ) view
>WHERE prefix||id = '...'
>
>In this case the prefixes have already been unioned together, so there's
>no chance for the planner to use the function index.
>
>If break the WHERE clause into seperate clauses, such as
>
>WHERE prefix='AAA' AND id = '2005000001'
>
>then I think the planner will know what selects it can simply ignore. If
>that doesn't work, then add 'AAA'||id AS fullid to each of the selects
>in the view and that should allow the function indexes to be used.
>
>

Thanks, both method sworks very fast now and use the expression indexes.
Thanks for the patience and the explanations.

Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-12-15 23:06:21 Re: Which qsort is used
Previous Message Greg Stark 2005-12-15 22:46:08 Re: Which qsort is used