Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Seneca Cunningham <scunning(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Date: 2005-12-02 15:02:14
Message-ID: 439061F6.2020202@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patchespgsql-ports

Tom Lane wrote:

>Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>  
>
>>I trimmed it down to:
>>  --with-prefer-libedit   prefer libedit over readline
>>    
>>
>
>OK, I can live with that.
>
>			
>  
>

I think it's ugly. Can't we just say --prefer-libedit ?

If must be a --with-foo flag, maybe --with-libedit-preferred or 
--with-libedit-first would be better.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Chris BrowneDate: 2005-12-02 17:14:09
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-12-02 14:14:31
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Cristian PrietoDate: 2005-12-02 15:12:15
Subject: Re: Graphics in postgress using GTK
Previous:From: Philip WarnerDate: 2005-12-02 14:55:09
Subject: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2005-12-02 15:55:13
Subject: Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-12-02 14:14:31
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group