From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Seneca Cunningham <scunning(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
Date: | 2005-12-02 18:38:10 |
Message-ID: | 200512021838.jB2IcA329747@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-ports |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >>I trimmed it down to:
> >> --with-prefer-libedit prefer libedit over readline
> >
>
> I think it's ugly. Can't we just say --prefer-libedit ?
>
> If must be a --with-foo flag, maybe --with-libedit-preferred or
> --with-libedit-first would be better.
OK, changed:
--with-bonjour build with Bonjour support
--with-openssl build with OpenSSL support
--with-libedit-preferred prefer libedit over readline
--without-readline do not use Readline
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
unknown_filename | text/plain | 10.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-02 18:39:00 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-02 18:32:42 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-02 18:39:00 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-02 18:32:42 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-02 18:39:00 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-02 18:32:42 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |