Re: Thoughts on MySQL and InnoDB

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Thoughts on MySQL and InnoDB
Date: 2005-12-01 21:59:53
Message-ID: 438F7259.9040106@Yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 12/1/2005 12:13 PM, Andreas Pflug wrote:

> Jan Wieck wrote:
>
>> Apparently the information is outdated. The functionality was added in
>> 5.0.10.
>>
>> http://forums.mysql.com/read.php?99,33676,33676,quote=1
>>
>> So I am not shocked about that any more, but more shocked that MySQL AB
>> feels free to make significant changes in features from one patchlevel
>> to another.
>
> Well, reading the changelog history apparently they call 5.0.15 from
> Oct.19th "Release", so all previous versions were Beta. I wonder how
> many MySQL 5.0 users are aware of that...

Er ... hmmmm ... so that means they have happy feature mucking during
BETA? This is unprofessional. BETA phase without feature freeze ... what
kind of hobby coders did they hire?

Jan

--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Slezak 2005-12-01 23:15:05 Re: joint booths at upcoming tradeshows
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2005-12-01 17:13:15 Re: Thoughts on MySQL and InnoDB