| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chuck McDevitt <cmcdevitt(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Should libedit be preferred to |
| Date: | 2005-11-23 03:36:27 |
| Message-ID: | 4383E3BB.3060705@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Chuck McDevitt wrote:
>Another vote for libedit support... We at Greenplum definitely want to
>use it.
>
>
If we are going to move toward libedit then libedit should be included
in core. Otherwise
you are creating a dependency on the largest postgresql used OS (linux).
The advantage
here of course is that we would be able to eliminate readline support
and focus only on
libedit.
The downside is yet another software in core.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-23 03:55:01 | Re: syntax extension for unsupported JOINs coming from a binary only (unmodifyable) program |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-11-23 03:30:59 | Re: server closed connection on a select query |