Re: generic builtin functions

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: generic builtin functions
Date: 2005-11-10 21:08:29
Message-ID: 4373B6CD.1010708@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>I'm not convinced that using bigint-equivalent space for an enum is a
>mortal sin...
>
>
>
>

at least venial ...

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matt Newell 2005-11-10 21:45:00 foreign key constraints referencing inherited relations - WIP
Previous Message Greg Stark 2005-11-10 21:05:40 Re: generic builtin functions