Re: generic builtin functions

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: generic builtin functions
Date: 2005-11-10 22:14:08
Message-ID: 20051110221408.GA27361@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 04:08:29PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >I'm not convinced that using bigint-equivalent space for an enum is
> >a mortal sin...
>
> at least venial ...

Heh.

Would ORDER BY somehow know about enums' given ordering?

Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david(at)fetter(dot)org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-11-10 22:19:16 Re: generic builtin functions
Previous Message Robert Treat 2005-11-10 22:13:15 Re: Obtaining a source tree from CVS