Re: automake

Dave Page wrote:
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de]
>>Sent: 10 November 2005 11:04
>>To: Dave Page
>>Cc: pgadmin-hackers
>>Subject: Re: automake
>>
>>Dave Page wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de]
>>>>Sent: 10 November 2005 09:39
>>>>To: Dave Page
>>>>Cc: pgadmin-hackers
>>>>Subject: Re: automake
>>>>
>>>>Did that, automake works now, but Makefile will have a
>>>>missing separator
>>>>in line 377.
>>>>
>>>>automake-1.9 will claim that *.m4 is created by aclocal-1.4, but
>>>>aclocal-1.9 will have throw warnings and automake-1.9 will
>>
>>fail then.
>>
>>>>If 1.9 is needed, it should be called explicitely in bootstrap, no?
>>>
>>>
>>>Eh? Do you have both installed in different locations or something?
>>
>>No, /usr/bin.
>>All versions are present, but ./bootstrap relies on
>>aclocal/autoconf to
>>point to the right versions.
>>
>>currently, aclocal-1.4 will run (without problem), but
>>automake-1.9 will
>>claim aclocal version and configure isn't created. aclocal-1.9 won't
>>run, many errors.
>
>
> Is this OK now (following an svn update)?

I get quite some warnings from aclocal, but after rm -r config* ac*;svn
update I'm workable again.

Regards,
Andreas