Database recovery

From: tony <tony(at)animaproductions(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Database recovery
Date: 2001-12-24 08:32:23
Message-ID: 4365337.1009182743929.JavaMail.root@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi

In the doc I have "this section needs to be written"

I have a database system to recover any pointers greatly appreciated. My tape backup is two weeks old... I know that is bad but I have to live with it.

Cheers

Tony Grant

--
tony(at)animaproductions(dot)com

JWebMail WebMail/Java v0.7.6 WWW to Mail Gateway
>From pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org Mon Dec 24 09:25:25 2001
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([192.204.191.242])
by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fBOEKvm13267
for <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Mon, 24 Dec 2001 09:20:57 -0500 (EST)
(envelope-from tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl(at)localhost [127.0.0.1])
by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fBOEKJL11641;
Mon, 24 Dec 2001 09:20:59 -0500 (EST)
To: Steven Lane <slane(at)mail(dot)fmpro(dot)com>
cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgres 7.1on Mac OS 10.1
In-reply-to: <v03007804b84a4ccf22f3(at)[67(dot)211(dot)145(dot)166]>
References: <v03007804b84a4ccf22f3(at)[67(dot)211(dot)145(dot)166]>
Comments: In-reply-to Steven Lane <slane(at)mail(dot)fmpro(dot)com>
message dated "Sat, 22 Dec 2001 08:50:07 -0600"
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 09:20:19 -0500
Message-ID: <11638(dot)1009203619(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
X-Archive-Number: 200112/783
X-Sequence-Number: 18873

Steven Lane <slane(at)mail(dot)fmpro(dot)com> writes:
> ... 7.1rc built fine this way, and I can start up
> the postmaster, but I can't make a new database.

The system() library function is broken in OSX 10.1. There's a
workaround in the backend/ports/darwin directory in 7.2beta4,
which you should be able to transpose into 7.1.

BTW, *please* use 7.1.3 not 7.1rc4 as your starting point.
There are some nontrivial bug fixes between.

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rob Arnold 2001-12-24 15:35:08 Re: PostgreSQL DBI DBD::Pg Access Problem
Previous Message postgresql 2001-12-24 07:44:16 Re: PostgreSQL DBI DBD::Pg Access Problem