re : tsearch2 problem

From: 沈一枫 <alphahunters(at)163(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: re : tsearch2 problem
Date: 2005-10-18 04:09:19
Message-ID: 4354756F.000018.19854@bj163app36.163.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thanks VERY VERY much for Teodor Sigaev help,and my next problem is which is more suitable

for index chinese words, TSearch2 OR Lucene? My mates said to me that Lucene is more effifent
because of its way of "Inverse Order OF Idexing",and "The GiST Tree is well for larting lan but doesn't for chinese lan(also ineffifent for Japanese lan)"。

I only know that GiST is also "Inverse Order OF Idexing",but of course it is a tree NOT as lucene does


What is your suggestion?Which is More suit for Chinese(Janpanese) ,TSearch2 OR Lucene?(Besides other components)

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sri 2005-10-18 04:21:01 Re: Problem using start transaction in nested transactions.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-10-18 02:32:49 Re: ANN: Rekall V2.4.0