PostgreSQL source inspection :)

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: PostgreSQL source inspection :)
Date: 2005-10-14 15:52:39
Message-ID: 434FD447.3080905@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general

Hello,

Command Prompt has started a community project to allow for easier
inspection of the
PostgreSQL source. The project is no where near complete but this is
what we have
done:

1. Converted the entire PostgreSQL CVS repository to SVN. This includes
all releases
all the way back to the initial commits by Marc.

2. Place trac in front of the repository for source browsing.

When we complete the project we hope the following will happen:

Daily conversions of the repository from CVS to SVN

The use of the Wiki to begin detailed discussion of the source in
general, creating
a dynamic PostgreSQL source HOWTO.

We are open to other ideas as well. One is the ability to submit bug
reports directly
to the pgsql-bugs list from the Trac system.

We would like to enable certain users to be able to run reports against
the source tree
as well.

The URL can be found here:

http://www-new.commandprompt.com/projects/pgsql

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

P.S. Yes we will be changing the layout.

--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Mayer 2005-10-14 17:18:46 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Oracle buys Innobase
Previous Message Tino Wildenhain 2005-10-13 20:28:04 quoting was: Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2005-10-14 15:54:36 Re: On "multi-master"
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2005-10-14 15:48:39 Re: On "multi-master"