| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1 |
| Date: | 2005-09-22 19:59:26 |
| Message-ID: | 43330D1E.7000606@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> On reflection, the only changes I suggest are:
>
> 1) the phrase "This allows for a type of table partitioning" have the
> word "basic" inserted within it to become: "This allows for a basic type
> of table partitioning"
How about just: Initial support for table partitioning. Yes it is
non-committal but that is a good thing since nobody 100% agrees anyway.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-09-22 20:01:49 | Re: 2 forks for md5? |
| Previous Message | AgentM | 2005-09-22 19:47:00 | Re: R: feature proposal ... |