Re: FAQ/HTML standard?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FAQ/HTML standard?
Date: 2005-09-10 18:31:06
Message-ID: 4323266A.1060509@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruno Wolff III wrote:

>On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 12:10:19 -0400,
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
>
>>Is there an HTML standard that we try to follow in our HTML docs such as
>>FAQs?
>>
>>If there isn't an explicit standard, may I suggest that we adopt XHTML
>>1.0 as the standard?
>>
>>
>
>I ran accross an article a few weeks ago that suggested that this wasn't
>all that great of an idea. Using HTML 4.01 should be just as useful.
>
>
>

I ran a cross a man in the street the other day who told me just the
opposite ;-)

Seriously, if you to use an argument like this you need to cite the
article, or at the very least summarise its arguments.

XHTML is simply a minimal reformulation of HTML in XML, and even uses
the HTML 4.01 definitions for its semantics. Given that, it's hard to
see why it should be considered a bad thing.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-09-10 18:38:33 Re: initdb profiles
Previous Message Jeff MacDonald 2005-09-10 18:10:58 Re: FAQ/HTML standard?