| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: initdb profiles |
| Date: | 2005-09-10 00:33:57 |
| Message-ID: | 432229F5.3050408@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 03:43:17AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>
>>What I would like to see is that initdb would end with saying that the
>>system is not really tuned and that I should run pg-some-program to
>>improve that. pg-some-program would analyze my system, ask me a few
>>questions, and then output a suggested configuration (or apply it right
>>away). Again, the challenge is to write that program.
>>
>>
>
>FYI, http://pgfoundry.org/projects/configurator/
>
>
Jim,
it's been referred to several times in this debate.
It might do what Peter wants, but for reasons already explained I don't
see it as a substitute for getting initdb to generate more realistic
settings.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-09-10 05:28:33 | Re: PostgreSQL from source using MinGW |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-09-10 00:12:24 | Re: initdb profiles |