Re: [HACKERS] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support

Petr Jelinek wrote:

> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>> I suspected we'd forgotten something.
>>
>> The attached small patch appears to be what's required (at least on
>> loris). "make check" failed but not for any apparent ipv6 reason.
>> More importantly, we correctly set HAVE_IPV6 and HAVE_STRUCT_ADDRINFO.
>
>
> Well this is what I ment with those proposed changes - I haven't sent
> patch, just said whats needed - always define HAVE_IPV6 and
> HAVE_STRUCT_ADDRINFO and include ws2tcpip.h, if you do just that
> include like your patch did, you'll break building on W2k (and like I
> said I don't know how to make HAVE_IPV6 and HAVE_STRUCT_ADDRINFO
> always defined under windows because I am not familiar with configure
> and thats why I haven't sent patch).
>

Really? Please don't assert it, test it and tell us what the error is. I
find it highly unlikely that it will break building on w2k, and only
slightly less unlikely that it will break running on w2k. But I want to
see the evidence (make error or error from runtime log).

The patch I sent should be exactly what is required to have HAVE_IPV6
and HAVE_STRUCT_ADDRINFO defined on windows. That should be true
regardless of which windows you are building on - the headers should be
the same.

cheers

andrew