| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pl/Ruby, deprecating plPython and Core |
| Date: | 2005-08-18 00:42:51 |
| Message-ID: | 4303D98B.5070607@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>> I find the whole argument that, lack of an untrusted version of the PL
>> means it should be deprecated, crazy. There are plenty of situations
>> where you don't care that the PL is untrusted.
>
>
> Yes you are absolutely correct. However my argument was more than that.
Right.
I was responding to the entire thread that was headed in the direction
of saying that just because a language doe not have a trusted PL
version, it should be removed.
As others have said, I find myself using PL/pgSQL when I need trusted,
and frequently use other languages when I need untrusted. And in most of
my experience, I don't even care if the language is trusted or
untrusted. There are plenty of use cases for both.
Joe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-08-18 00:57:38 | still looking for getaddrinfo |
| Previous Message | Johnny C. Lam | 2005-08-17 23:14:20 | Re: pthread stack on FreeBSD WAS: HEAD doesn't cope with |