Re: pl/Ruby, deprecating plPython and Core

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pl/Ruby, deprecating plPython and Core
Date: 2005-08-17 07:50:13
Message-ID: 4302EC35.2070204@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Fetter wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 01:17:27PM -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>
>>I promise that the aggregate work required for all coders who know
>>Python to switch to ruby is far far greater than the work required
>>to fix the issues with pl/python. :)
>
> Are you certain? See above in re: what Guido had to say.
>

I find the whole argument that, lack of an untrusted version of the PL
means it should be deprecated, crazy. There are plenty of situations
where you don't care that the PL is untrusted.

Joe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Hallgren 2005-08-17 08:05:09 Re: pl/Ruby, deprecating plPython and Core
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2005-08-17 07:48:38 Re: Missing CONCURRENT VACUUM (Was: Release notes for