| From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch |
| Date: | 2005-08-12 23:41:07 |
| Message-ID: | 42FD3393.7050402@pse-consulting.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>
> I don't assume people using psql will care about the current log files ---
Hm. Probably because you think these users will have direct file access?
Which in turn means they can edit *.conf directly too and don't need an
interface for that either.
> it would be something done in C or another application language. Aren't
> the file names already ordered based on their file names, given the
> default pattern, postgresql-%Y-%m-%d_%H%M%S.log?
The issue is _filtering_, not ordering. Since the log directory might be
directed to a different location, non-pgsql logfiles might be there too.
You'd probably won't expect to retrieve these files over a pgsql connection.
Regards,
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-08-12 23:53:05 | Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-08-12 23:20:53 | Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch |