Re: gram.y=>preproc.y

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: gram.y=>preproc.y
Date: 2008-11-10 21:04:33
Message-ID: 42F44CF1-2D00-4A19-B862-BBB25A48BEE7@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Nov 10, 2008, at 11:17 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> David, how is your awk-fu? If it's any good then I'm happy to leave
> it to you. Otherwise I will try to make a few hours somewhere to un-
> uglify this.

My Perl is excellent, but my awk is remedial. What part does awk play?

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-11-10 21:21:35 Re: gram.y=>preproc.y
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-11-10 20:54:27 Re: SQL5 budget