| From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Remote administration functionality |
| Date: | 2005-08-01 14:17:37 |
| Message-ID: | 42EE2F01.4000009@pse-consulting.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>>Isn't the pg_hba.conf situation quite the same as postgresql.conf? The
>>GUCs with pg_settings is the GUC like a table, but with comments that
>>exceed config_generic.long_desc.
>
>
> Well, pg_hba.conf is ordered,
From a text editor user's view, postgresql.conf is ordered too. I'd be
annoyed if some function would screw it up; same with comments which are
deliberately placed where they are.
> which is different, and it more of a
> columnar values that postgresql.conf.
Hm, pg_settings gives me the same picture.
Regards,
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-08-01 14:18:25 | Re: Remote administration functionality |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-08-01 14:15:51 | Re: Remote administration functionality |