| From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity |
| Date: | 2005-06-24 05:42:40 |
| Message-ID: | 42BB9D50.6020701@samurai.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Jan Wieck wrote:
> But what if they decide to allow
>
> LOOP
> -- ...
> IF condition THEN
> EXIT;
> END LOOP;
>
> at some point? There you'd get ambiguity.
ISTM this would be ambiguous in any case:
IF condition1 THEN
foo;
IF condition2 THEN
bar;
END IF;
-Neil
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2005-06-24 05:43:32 | Re: Function's LEAST, GREATEST and DECODE (Oracle vararg |
| Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2005-06-24 05:38:02 | Re: Fixing r-tree semantics |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2005-06-24 05:43:32 | Re: Function's LEAST, GREATEST and DECODE (Oracle vararg |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2005-06-24 04:31:41 | Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity |