| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
| Cc: | Peter Galbavy <peter(dot)galbavy(at)knowtion(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: LGPL |
| Date: | 2005-06-18 16:56:29 |
| Message-ID: | 42B4523D.6090101@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>>
>>>
>>
>>So, is there an effort to not require GNU make then ?
>
>
> Neither using GNU make or gcc make to buld a binary make the resulting binary
> bound by the GPL.
That is correct because all (well most) of the libraries used by GCC are
LGPL not GPL.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2005-06-18 16:59:50 | Re: Post-mortem: final 2PC patch |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-18 16:53:05 | Re: Post-mortem: final 2PC patch |