Re: Consumer-grade vs enterprise-grade disk drives

From: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Consumer-grade vs enterprise-grade disk drives
Date: 2005-05-31 05:08:38
Message-ID: 429BF156.5080708@paradise.net.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Luke Lonergan wrote:
> Tom,
>
> This is a story that is evolving. Anyone else use StorageReview? Great
> comprehensive drive benchmarks:
> http://www.storagereview.com/
>
> Check the comparisons between 15K RPM SCSI drives and the 2004 Western
> Digital 10K RPM SATA (Raptor) drives. The Raptors are an interesting hybrid
> of SCSI-related tech and desktop tech, and were some of the first drives
> with SCSI-like command queuing TCQ/NCQ.
>
> I think the last remaining issue in moving to SATA for all enterprise use is
> the lack of decent SATA controllers, though 3Ware (http://www.3ware.com) is
> getting there:
> http://www.3ware.com/link/pdf/Serial-ATA.pdf
> http://www.3ware.com/products/benchmarks_sata.asp
>

Although the benchmark numbers are pretty good, they have only published
(what looks like) results for sequential IO. It would be interesting to
see the random ones, as this would tell us how effective the TCQ
implementation is.

Cheers

Mark

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Kirkwood 2005-05-31 05:11:17 Re: Consumer-grade vs enterprise-grade disk drives
Previous Message Luke Lonergan 2005-05-31 04:38:15 Re: Consumer-grade vs enterprise-grade disk drives