| From: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] pg_buffercache causes assertion failure |
| Date: | 2005-05-31 01:07:15 |
| Message-ID: | 429BB8C3.3060503@paradise.net.nz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> writes:
>
>>This patch changes the use of numeric to int8 to represent the
>>relblocknumber column.
>
>
> Applied, thanks.
>
>
This reminds me:
I did some patches for 7.4 and 8.0 a while ago (attached) - while I do
not expect these to be applied (unless it's ok for contrib to get extra
modules in stable releases...), is there somewhere for things like this
to go?
cheers
Mark
P.s : They are amended to use int8 too :-)
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| contrib-buffercache-7.4.patch | text/plain | 12.4 KB |
| contrib-buffercache-8.0.patch | text/plain | 12.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2005-05-31 01:08:27 | Re: O_DIRECT for WAL writes |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-05-31 00:14:16 | Re: A 2 phase commit weirdness |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2005-05-31 01:08:27 | Re: O_DIRECT for WAL writes |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-31 00:08:59 | Re: [HACKERS] pg_buffercache causes assertion failure |