Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry)

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry)
Date: 2005-05-18 01:17:37
Message-ID: 428A97B1.5080203@samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> You can even respond to specific messages within the thread instead of
> just a top down (one email after the other).

Well, that seems pretty fundamental...

>> But the point is that the current system works well;
>
> Well does it though? I am not saying it is bad, well yes I am ;). There
> is no central place for me to point one of my developers and say -- Hey,
> look at this patch... weren't we working on something like this? Let's
> help them out.

I'm not saying there is not room for improvement -- my point is that the
fundamental workflow (email submission of patches, discussion and
resolution via mailing list discussion) works well, and I don't see any
need to change it. If there are tools that help us improve this process
(e.g. archiving the resolution of old issues, as you suggest), they are
worth considering. In other words, I'd like a tool that fits the way we
work now, not one that forces us to change our processes to adapt to its
requirements.

Anyway, RT sounds like perhaps it is worth investigating.

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-05-18 02:08:43 Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry)
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-05-18 01:00:48 Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry)