Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>, Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
Subject: Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches
Date: 2008-07-22 20:49:35
Message-ID: 4289.1216759775@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> writes:
> Note that while slony doesn't require a dump/restore to get activated, it
> seems to me (as a non user of it) that it still plays with catalog,
> preventing "normal" usage of pg_dump...

As of 8.3 there are some new trigger features in core that were put
there for Slony. I'm not sure to what extent that will let them get
rid of making nonstandard catalog changes ... perhaps Chris or Jan
can explain.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2008-07-22 20:54:20 Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2008-07-22 20:33:19 Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?