Re: pl/pgsql enabled by default

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pl/pgsql enabled by default
Date: 2005-05-08 02:54:22
Message-ID: 427D7F5E.4000406@samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Mike Mascari wrote:
> Correct, as the vulnerability exists within the 'SQL' language as well.
> The only difference is that enabling plpgsql by default changes it from
> a leak to a full blown flood.

How does it make any difference at all?

-Neil

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-05-08 02:59:09 Dealing with CLUSTER failures
Previous Message Mike Mascari 2005-05-08 02:49:24 Re: pl/pgsql enabled by default