| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default? |
| Date: | 2011-05-07 01:17:50 |
| Message-ID: | 4279.1304731070@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> As a packager, what I'd really want to see from a division into
>> recommended and not-so-recommended packages is that they get installed
>> into different subdirectories by "make install".
> Well, that might be good, too. But, right now, if someone pulls up
> our documentation, or our source tree, they could easily be forgiven
> for thinking that hstore and dummy_seclabel are comparable, and they
> aren't.
Sure, but that's a documentation issue, which again is not going to be
helped by a source-tree rearrangement.
As somebody who spends a lot of time on back-patching, I'm not excited
in the least by suggestions to rearrange the source tree for marginal
cosmetic benefits, which is all that I see here.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-05-07 01:19:42 | Re: Fix incorrect description at SECURITY LABEL documentation |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-05-07 01:03:57 | Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default? |