Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?

From: "apoc9009(at)yahoo(dot)de" <apoc9009(at)yahoo(dot)de>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?
Date: 2005-04-26 09:43:21
Message-ID: 426E0D39.5020001@yahoo.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ok!
The Links your posted are great and i guessing it will help me a lot!

But the other Question (if Tablepartitioning under Developemt and will
it be supported generally)
is still alive.

Josh

Qingqing Zhou wrote:

><apoc9009(at)yahoo(dot)de> writes
>
>
>>I have done the following Post to PSQL Performance, but Richard Huxton
>>say it
>>might be a better Idea to post it again on you List so i forward the
>>message.
>>
>>
>...
>
>
>>It is exiting to see thadt Verison 8.0 has Tablespaces like ORACLE and
>>DB/2,
>>but i need Partitioning on a few very large Tables.
>>
>>
>...
>
>Richard said you can *search* in this list ... Here are two links might be
>of your interests:
>
>http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2004-12/msg00101.php - how
>to do horizonal partition using inheritance;
>
>http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2005-03/msg00370.php - a
>long list of discussing the future partition implementation;
>
>
>Regards,
>Qingqing
>
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>
>
>
*

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2005-04-26 11:20:38 bitmapscan test, no success, bs is not faster
Previous Message Qingqing Zhou 2005-04-26 09:25:12 Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?