Re: Bound column and serial datatype question

From: Marko Ristola <marko(dot)ristola(at)kolumbus(dot)fi>
To: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bound column and serial datatype question
Date: 2005-04-23 06:57:11
Message-ID: 4269F1C7.7090906@kolumbus.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc


If you remove the NOT NULL definition from the CustomerNr,
you can put there a NULL value too.

The SQL email list is better for these questions, because they have
more knoledge of these kinds of problems ...

(The CustomerNr and ID columns seem to have redundant information.)

Regards,
Marko Ristola

lothar(dot)behrens(at)lollisoft(dot)de wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I have a table like this:
>
>CREATE TABLE Kunden
>(
> ID serial NOT NULL,
> CustomerNr serial NOT NULL,
> Name CHAR(100),
> ...
>);
>
>Using bound columns in a form to show the customer data I don´t like to let the user
>updating the CustomerNr field. This is because, a normal data field is not
>autogenerated, but these 'serial' data fields.
>
>But I like to show the CustomerNr field in the form. Therefore, I simply made the
>field readonly in the form. But if I insert a new row, the fields data (defaults to 0)
>would be used as the new value in the table.
>
>How to avoid this ?
>
>Thanks
>
>Lothar
>
>--
>Lothar Behrens www.lollisoft.de
>Rosmarinstr 3 My public project:
>40235 Düsseldorf http://sourceforge.net/projects/lbdmf
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joel Fradkin 2005-04-23 14:18:31 Re: [PERFORM] Joel's Performance Issues WAS : Opteron vs Xeon
Previous Message Marko Ristola 2005-04-23 06:36:50 Re: Another post 7.3.02 bug Was: ODBC and encodings problem