Re: DELETE ... USING

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <eulerto(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DELETE ... USING
Date: 2005-04-07 01:57:13
Message-ID: 42549379.3050803@samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Neil Conway wrote:
> Sure, a revised patch is attached. Note that this change will also
> require updating 25 (!) of the regression tests, since they use the
> SELECT-without-FROM syntax.

I've applied the attached patch to HEAD. Due to the widespread updates
to the regression tests, the tests for some platforms may be (trivially)
broken, despite my efforts to make the necessary updates. If that's the
case, please let me know.

-Neil

Attachment Content-Type Size
delete_using-9.patch.gz application/gzip 16.7 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-04-07 01:59:06 Re: prepared statements don't log arguments?
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2005-04-06 23:24:46 Re: Recognizing range constraints (was Re: Plan for

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2005-04-07 07:04:26 add_missing_from = false
Previous Message Neil Conway 2005-04-06 23:56:25 Re: avg(int2) and avg(int8) micro-opt