From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments |
Date: | 2005-04-01 05:54:48 |
Message-ID: | 424CE228.5010107@familyhealth.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
>>But half of the postgresql "functions" are in the grammar anyway -
>>they're not even listed.
>
> Should we look at adding stub functions into pg_proc for \df display
> somehow?
I'm not suggesting that at all. I was just pointing out that \df isn't
a useful view of 'what functions does postgresql have that i can use'
Chris
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2005-04-01 06:06:29 | Re: add_missing_from in 8.1 |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-04-01 05:54:19 | Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2005-04-01 08:41:41 | Re: [HACKERS] contrib/pg_buffercache |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-04-01 05:54:19 | Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments |