Re: invalidating cached plans

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: invalidating cached plans
Date: 2005-03-17 05:11:46
Message-ID: 42391192.80408@samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway wrote:
> Do we want to share plans between call sites?

After thinking about this a little more, I think the answer is "no" --
it doesn't really buy us much, and introduces some extra complications
(e.g. resource management).

BTW, it's quite annoying that the planner scribbles on its input. I've
got half a mind to fix this before doing the rest of the cache
invalidation work. That might be quite a large project, however...

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-03-17 05:14:44 Re: invalidating cached plans
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-03-17 04:31:59 Re: Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for