Re: invalidating cached plans

From: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, List pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: invalidating cached plans
Date: 2005-03-17 10:07:19
Message-ID: 1111054039.4169.255.camel@petra
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 16:11 +1100, Neil Conway wrote:
> Neil Conway wrote:
> > Do we want to share plans between call sites?
>
> After thinking about this a little more, I think the answer is "no" --
> it doesn't really buy us much, and introduces some extra complications
> (e.g. resource management).

It was already implemented as experiment and I think better is keep
plans separate.

karel

--
Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Hallgren 2005-03-17 12:15:57 Re: Savepoints and SPI
Previous Message Karel Zak 2005-03-17 09:56:28 Re: change palloc to malloc