Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies

From: Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>
To: Laszlo Hornyak <kocka(at)forgeahead(dot)hu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies
Date: 2005-03-11 09:53:54
Message-ID: 42316AB2.3060903@mailblocks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Laszlo Hornyak wrote:

>The default should be the default used by PostgreSQL, and the extra ones
>should be commented out under it.
>Not the most user friendly solution, but can we do anything else?
>
>
Yes, we can do as I suggested and select mapping depending on the GUC
variable "integer_datetimes". I guess you have some initial handshake
between the postgresql backend and the JVM where you can negotiate
things like that?

Regards,
Thomas Hallgren

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2005-03-11 09:55:35 Re: [PATCHES] WAL: O_DIRECT and multipage-writer (+
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2005-03-11 08:20:00 Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP