Re: Timestamp vs. Interval and formatting....

From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>
To: Dan Jewett <dan(at)thenormalfamily(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Timestamp vs. Interval and formatting....
Date: 2004-01-04 20:47:49
Message-ID: 421D3F1A-3EF7-11D8-BA4F-000A95C88220@myrealbox.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

Hi Dan,

On Jan 4, 2004, at 2:11 PM, Dan Jewett wrote:
> I've been building an application to catalog my CD collection, and have
> been merrily adding the track lengths to a field of type "interval".
> This seemed to make the most sense if I wanted to do math on them (ie.
> totals) later on. Everything was working well until I realized that
> tracks over 24 minutes were being returned as "1 day HH:MM". What is
> the easiest way to limit the field to MM:SS?

As you've noticed, your intention of inserting MM:SS is being
interpreted by PostgreSQL as HH::MM instead. Here's what worked for me:

test=# create table track_length (trackid int, length interval);
CREATE TABLE
test=# insert into track_length values (1,'1 min 32 sec');
INSERT 1196294 1
test=# select * from track_length;
trackid | length
---------+----------
1 | 00:01:32
(1 row)

Your system is probably more complex than this, but you can see how it
works. Check out the following link for more details.

<http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/datatype-
datetime.html#AEN4289>

Does this help?

Michael Glaesemann
grzm myrealbox com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sukellusseura Vesikot r.y. 2004-01-04 21:15:43 Re: install
Previous Message ghaverla 2004-01-04 20:19:52 Re: Creating data bases