| From: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Kouber Saparev <postgresql(at)saparev(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Help me recovering data |
| Date: | 2005-02-16 23:42:10 |
| Message-ID: | 4213DA52.6070809@zeut.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com writes:
>
>
>>Maybe I'm missing something, but shouldn't the prospect of data loss (even
>>in the presense of admin ignorance) be something that should be
>>unacceptable? Certainly within the realm "normal PostgreSQL" operation.
>>
>>
>
>Once autovacuum gets to the point where it's used by default, this
>particular failure mode should be a thing of the past, but in the
>meantime I'm not going to panic about it.
>
Which I hope will be soon.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sergey E. Koposov | 2005-02-16 23:53:16 | Re: Strange RETURN NEXT behaviour in Postgres 8.0 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-16 23:21:11 | Re: Strange RETURN NEXT behaviour in Postgres 8.0 |