Re:

From: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
To: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "E(dot)Rodichev" <er(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su
Subject: Re:
Date: 2005-02-15 17:09:42
Message-ID: 42122CD6.5050000@zeut.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander wrote:

>>I've tested the performance of 8.0.1 at my dual-boot notebook
>>(Linux and Windows XP).
>>
>>I installed 8.0.1 for Linux and Windows XP, and run pgbench
>>-c 1 -t 1000 Under Linux (kernel 2.6.10) I got about 800 tps,
>>and under Windows XP - about 20-24 tps.
>>
>>Next I switched off virtual memory under Windows (as it was
>>recommended in posting
>>http://www.pgsql.ru/db/mw/msg.html?mid=2026070). It does not
>>help. Without virtual memory I got 15-17 tps.
>>
>>
>Question 1: Is your writeback cache really disabled in Linux, on the
>harddrive? Windows fsync will *write through the disk write cache* if
>the driver is properly implemented. AFAIK, on Linux if write cache is
>enabled on the drive, fsync will only get into the cache.
>800tps sounds unreasonably high on a notebook.
>
>Question 2: Please try disabling the stats connector and see if that
>helps. Merlin Moncure reported some scalability issues with the stats
>collector previously.
>

Also, didn't someone recently report some very significant performance
differences Windows networking QoS (Quality of Service) installed? You
might try that.

In response to

  • Re: at 2005-02-15 16:33:02 from Magnus Hagander

Responses

  • Re: at 2005-02-15 17:35:17 from E.Rodichev

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message E.Rodichev 2005-02-15 17:35:17 Re:
Previous Message E.Rodichev 2005-02-15 17:03:39 Re: