| From: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Benchmark |
| Date: | 2005-02-13 09:21:04 |
| Message-ID: | 420F1C00.7030808@cheapcomplexdevices.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Great Bridge did essentially that years ago, but I think we only got
> away with it because we didn't say which DBs "Commercial Database A"
> and "Commercial Database B" actually were. Even off the record, we
> were only allowed to tell people that the commercial DBs were Oracle
> and SQL Server ... but not which was which.
IMHO clues like:
"What versions of the databases did you use?
- PostgreSQL - 7.0 release version
- Proprietary 1 - 8.1.5
- Proprietary 2 - 7.0
- MySQL - 3.22.32
- Interbase - 6.0
"
and
"PostgreSQL" and "Proprietary 1" was running "red hat linux 6.1" and
"Proprietary 2" was running Windows NT server 4 - service pack 4"
in articles like this one: http://www.xperts.com/news/press1.htm
helped some people narrow it down a bit. :)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2005-02-13 16:34:54 | Re: Benchmark |
| Previous Message | Christopher Browne | 2005-02-13 01:34:24 | Re: Benchmark |